Showing posts with label sculpture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sculpture. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Cubist Camouflage / she had heard of Jacob Epstein

Jacob Epstein portrait by George Charles Beresford / 1916
Edith Nesbit, CUBIST CAMOUFLAGE, in the Melbourne Leader (Melbourne AU), July 27, 1918, p. 50—

Miss Morbydde was throughly up to date…[she] was abreast of her times; she had heard of the [Jacob] Epstein Venus, all right, and knew that there was an eccentricity called Cubism. That a pupil should desire instruction in this eccentric art seemed to be only one more of the surprises which modern life inexhaustibly supplied to Miss Morbydde. By the greatest good fortune a Cubist Artist was found not too far from the school, an elderly foreigner of obscure nationality and doubtful cleanliness, warranted, to Miss Morbydde’s experience, as wholly safe.

“Of course, I understand Cubist art,” she assured Sir Moses. “Another pupil is to have lessons this term. It happens that a Cubic Artist is available. An elderly foreigner. He occupies a lodge on my estate. He cuts wood; he admires the shape of the logs. All angles, you know. No, he is not mad. But he is wholly unattractive.”

Portrait of Jacob Epstein / photographer unknown

RELATED LINKS 

Dazzle Camouflage: What is it and how did it work?Nature, Art, and Camouflage / Art, Women's Rights, and CamouflageEmbedded Figures, Art, and Camouflage / Art, Gestalt, and Camouflage /  Optical science meets visual artDisruption versus dazzle / Chicanery and conspicuousness /  Under the big top at Sims' circus

Tuesday, April 8, 2025

sculptor Frederick Triebel denied role as camoufleur

American artist Frederick E. Triebel (1865-1944) was not a camouflage artist. He was certainly qualified, and he offered to enlist as that during World War I. But to no avail, with his age as a possible factor.

He was born in Peoria IL, and his parents were from Germany, where his father had been a sculptor, a stone carver and monument craftsman. Frederick followed his father’s profession. He apprenticed to a Chicago stone carver, and subsequently studied art in New York, Boston, and in Florence, Italy. When he returned to the US in 1899, he was the first artist to locate his studio in MacDougal Alley in Greenwich Village. His studio was at No. 6.

When the US entered WWI in 1917, Triebel applied unsuccessfully to be a US army camoufleur. He also asked to be assigned to the American Intelligence Service as an interpreter. But that too was denied, so he then applied to work for the YMCA in France, in connection with their duty huts.

As reported in an article titled SCULPTOR A SHIP WORKER: F.E. Triebell Applied in Overalls for a job at Hog Island (China Press, December 15, 1918)—

 “Finally, he attired himself in a laborer’s clothes, journeyed to Hog Island [a major shipyard] and applied for a position.”

In applying, he said “'1 am a stone cutter and have worked at the trade nearly all my life.’

The interviewer did not reply immediately. He was looking at the hand which rested on his desk. It was long, slim, and with tapering fingers, the nails neatly manicured and in appearance as soft as a woman's.

‘I am sorry, but we have no positions open for stone cutters at this time,’ the interviewer said.

‘Then you can use a tracer?’ the applicant persisted. ‘I really have few superiors in that line.’

Tracers were badly needed, an affirmative reply was given, the applicant was accepted and put to work.” 

RELATED LINKS    

Dazzle Camouflage: What is it and how did it work?Nature, Art, and Camouflage / Art, Women's Rights, and CamouflageEmbedded Figures, Art, and Camouflage / Art, Gestalt, and Camouflage /  Optical science meets visual artDisruption versus dazzle / Chicanery and conspicuousness /  Under the big top at Sims' circus

Thursday, February 20, 2025

Clara Lathrop Strong / New England Camouflage Artist

Above Portrait drawing of British author Aldous Huxley  by Eric Pape, teacher of Clara Lathrop Strong, as published in The Sphere, October 12, 1929. Public domain.

•••

On October 3, 1917, a brief article appeared in The Boston Transcript. The headline read CAMOUFLAGE BY WOMEN: Here Is a Chance for Wily Females to Show the Boches Some New Art Tricks. The full text read as follows—

A project has been launched to organize women artists who may desire instruction in the work ot camouflage, Land has been offered for a camp, and the scheme has the unofficial approval ot the War Department, which is, however, at the present time, unable to spare any men from the first camouflage unlt as instructors. If and when they become avallable, further detalls as to time and place and equipment, etc., will be given out. It is believed that many women artists will embrace the opportunity to use thelr special training in patriotic service of this sort. It is probable that the women would be used only in this country, nevertheless the exigencies of war cannot be foreseen, and preparation along this line is thought to be desirable. We are informed that “there is no age limit,” but applicants should be strong and active, and should have had training in landscape, mural or scenic palnting, or in sculpture. All those interested are requested to send thelr names and addresees to Mrs. Clara Strong, Marshfield Hllls, Mass.

Mrs. Clara [née Lathrop] Strong (1883-1955) was a painter, muralist, illustrator, sculptor, and writer. Born in Cambridge MA, she studied in California at Stanford University, and subsequently at Oberlin College in Ohio. After returning to Massachusetts, she studied art in Boston at the Eric Pape School of Art, and in New York with muralist Edwin Blashfield*. She opened her own studio in 1908. A year later, she married a Boston Back Bay surgeon named Seth L. Strong, who had also attended Oberlin, and earned his medical degree at Harvard University in 1913. During the first twelve years of their marriage, they became parents of four children.

In late 1917, a lengthy article appeared in the Chicago Examiner (December 2, p. 29), titled Camouflage the Art of Faking, Throwing Fritz Off the Trail. One of the illustrations was a photograph of Clara Strong, working in her studio. The caption reads: Mrs. C.L. Strong, Who Heads a School for Camouflage. In the closing paragraph, the article states:

Mrs. Clara Lothrop [sic] Strong, of Marshfield Hills, Mass., a well-known New England artist, has formed a school for painting camouflage.

Two other articles claim that Mrs. Strong “was the honorary head of the women’s camouflage war workers during the war” (Boston Traveler, July 13, 1921), and that “She became nationally famous as the originator of the camouflage camp, and in the World War was an instructor in the art of wartime camouflage” (Boston Herald, February 16, 1923).

Her participation in the Women’s Reserve Camouflage Corps during WWI is confirmed by an article in the New York Times (July 12, 1918), titled CAMOUFLAGE THE RECRUIT: Women’s Service Corps Redecorate the Landship in Union Square. She was one of twenty-four women who participated in that project.

The time frame is confusing, but the same 1921 article in the Boston Traveler states that Clara Lathrop Strong, her husband and their children lived in Bangkok, Thailand, during 1918. During that assignment, her husband was in charge of the Royal Medical College there. It provided Clara Strong with the opportunity to become acquainted with the traditional art of that country. In an issue of the Boston Advertiser (February 19, 1922), she is said to have made sculptures that were derivative of certain ceremonial dances, and to have been allowed to paint inside the Royal Palace, “where no foreigner and especially no woman, had previously been permitted.”

However, during this same time period, there are other news articles that indicate that the marriage of Seth and Clara Strong was disentegrating. On the front page of a 1922 issue of the Boston American (November 15), there was a portrait photograph of Clara Lathrop Strong for an article with the headline: SCULPTRESS ACCUSED BY HER HUSBAND: WIFE TRIED TO KILL HIM SAYS DOCTOR. The husband claimed that, as early as 1919, when he refused his wife’s request that the family move to New York, she assaulted him, and threatened to harm their youngest child. He also claimed that she had attempted to kill him by turning on the gas jets in his Boston office. All of which Clara Lathrop Strong denied.

The husband filed for divorce and petitioned for custody of their children. “I loved my husband dearly,” she said, “until he brought this suit against me.” She countersued for custody, and when the marriage was terminated, she was granted “separate support and custody of her four children.” All this was headlined in the press, which must have been unbearable for everyone involved.

As if that were not tragic enough, another incident took place in 1934, coincident with the Great Depression. This apparently had to do with the Emergency Relief Administration (ERA), a government assistance agency that provided assistance to artists. In an article in The Boston Herald (November 21), Clara Strong is quoted as describing herself as “nearly destitute.” 

She had applied for a painting commission but was rejected on the grounds that “relief officials told her that she seemed to have sufficient means to live on.” In anonymous protest, she entered a mural in an annual exhibition—using a pseudonym—in which she satirized “the ERA and ‘sacred cows’ who have been given ERA commissions.” When the artwork was rejected, she protested. Living “modestly” in a temporary residence, she said that “she has had to take her son out of college and has sold her antique furniture as proof of her qualifications for help from the state and government.”

That’s the extent of our findings so far. A distressingly complex story, and no doubt unexplained in many regards.

•••

*It’s interesting that in 1917, when the US entered WWI, a group of East Coast artists, headed by Barry Faulkner and Sherry E. Fry, formed a civilian organization called the American Camouflage Corps. It anticipated the wartime need for skilled artists to serve as army camoufleurs. The chairman of the group was Clara Strong’s teacher, muralist Edwin Blashfield.

RELATED LINKS    

Dazzle Camouflage: What is it and how did it work?Nature, Art, and Camouflage / Art, Women's Rights, and CamouflageEmbedded Figures, Art, and Camouflage / Art, Gestalt, and Camouflage /  Optical science meets visual artDisruption versus dazzle / Chicanery and conspicuousness /  Under the big top at Sims' circus

Sunday, December 22, 2024

WWI camouflage artist / taxidermist Louis Paul Jonas

Taxidermy Hall of Fame
It certainly comes as no surprise that a person who practices taxidermy would also be interested in the appearance of animals, in protective coloration, mimicry, and camouflage. Over the years, I’ve run across any number of naturalists, museum exhibit designers, ornithologists, and wildlife artists, who, at one time or another, have contributed to the study of camouflage in nature. Some have even served during wartime as camouflage consultants.

Shown above is a photograph of the well-known museum display of a group of African elephants in the Akeley Hall of the American Museum of Natural History. It was completed by a famous naturalist, taxidermist and sculptor named Carl Akeley, who collaborated on it with one of his prominent students, the sculptor and museum exhibit designer Louis Paul Jonas (1894-1971). Born in Budapest, Hungary, Jonas initially worked with his two older brothers, who owned a taxidermy studio in Denver (eventually there were five brothers in the firm). After moving to New York, he established his own studio, and created admired exhibits in more than 50 museums throughout the world.

I want to focus on Louis Paul Jonas because I hadn’t realized that, during World War I, he served in the US Army’s Camouflage Corps. I learned this only recently from a news article titled MONSTER MAKER, so-titled because he had been commissioned by the Sinclair Oil Company to build full-size fiberglas models of dinosaurs for the New York World’s Fair.

In that article (published in the Barrytown Explorer, Barrytown NY, on October 1, 1963, p. 4), it states that Jonas bought a 120-acre farm near Churchtown NY “and gradually made over the barns and stables into studios, and built up a staff from among his Columbia County neighbors. Now he has a staff of 16 experts, all trained by himself. One he found in a Hudson shirt factory, a young Italian who had been a mold maker in a ceramics works back home; several were members of an Adult Education class in sculpture conducted by Jonas in connection with the Hudson school system—bricklayers, housewives, and factory workers among them; three came to him via the GI Training Program, and the rest are members of his own family, including his ‘key man,’ Louis Paul Jonas Jr.” An extraordinary person obviously.

Sunday, June 18, 2023

cubist style condemned as too germanic or boche

Monument by WWI camoufleurs Mare, Süe and Jaulmes
Mary Sperling McAuliffe, When Paris sizzled: the 1920s Paris of Hemingway, Chanel, Cocteau, Cole Porter, Josephine Baker, and their friends. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2016, page 52—

Given the [Paris WWI Victory] parade’s many admirable qualities, it was unfortunate that the work of art meant to commemorate the war’s fallen soldiers at the Fétes de la Victoire came to a bad end. The privilege of creating a memorial for the war dead had gone to three men: the painter André Mare, along with his associates, architect Louis Süe and designer Gustave Jaulmes, all three former members of wartime camouflage units at the front. Their creation [shown above, on July 14, 1919, to the right of the Arc de Triomphe], a huge gilded cénotaph, or tomblike monument, thrust upward in the form of a gigantic bier, its sides decorated with Winged Victories, each backed by a pair of real wings from French warplanes. It had been a mammoth undertaking and was unquestionably meant to be patriotic, but critics fiercely derided it as Germanic or “Boche” art. Mare was known for his Cubist style—indeed, he had been painting French artillery with Cubist designs when he was badly wounded at the front—and “l’affaire du cénotaphe” was immediately perceived by Mare’s supporters as an attack by traditionalists on Cubism. 

RELATED LINKS

Nature, Art, and Camouflage (35 min. video talk)

Art, Women’s Rights, and Camouflage (29 min. video talk)

Embedded Figures, Art, and Camouflage (26 min. video talk)

Art, Gestalt, and Camouflage (28 min. video talk)