the perils of counterfeiting / a George H. Blair cartoon

Above This is a camouflage-related cartoon from 1918. It was drawn by George H. Blair, who was a Boston-area newspaper artist and cartoonist. I don’t know where it was first published (this is a restored and rearranged version) but it may have been the Boston Globe. Blair was not a camoufleur, and the relevance of this cartoon and camouflage may be a stretch. Someone in the cartoon—namely Uncle Zeke’s ram Old Ben—has been hoodwinked into thinking that a painting of a ram is the same as the thing itself, a counterfeit. My friend and colleague of many years, plant ecologist Paul Whitson and I once collaborated on an essay that addressed the same subject, titled “Mimicry, Metaphor and Mistake,” which can be accessed here online.

•••

EASY MONEY ADOPTS OLD STUNT: Takes Dollar Bills and Makes Tens Out of Them: Neat Piece of Work: Camouflaged Bill Discovered Today at Bank Where It Was Deposited—Report Made to US Treasury in Alexandria Gazette (Alexandria VA) November 7, 1919—

Making tens out of ones is the art some enterprising Alexandrian just now is engaged in. In other words the guilty party is taking Uncle Sam's perfectly good one dollar bills and converting them into $10 bills.

The deception was discovered this morning when a victim of the clever camouflage presented the supposed $10 with his usual morning bank deposit.

The counterfeiter it was admitted had done a rather clever piece of work which while it might not pass the average banker it certainly would fool the average busy merchant.

The master camouflager had taken the edges of four ten dollar bilk and cut off a sufficient part from each one to make the figure naught and to all intents and purposes had produced a perfectly good ten dollar bill by using a little glue to help complete the deception.

The bank officials have made a report of the work of the counterfeiter and efforts probably will be made by the Secret Service men to chase the frenzied financier down. 

•••

RELATED LINKS    

Dazzle Camouflage: What is it and how did it work? /  Nature, Art, and Camouflage / Art, Women's Rights, and Camouflage /  Embedded Figures, Art, and Camouflage / Art, Gestalt, and Camouflage /  Optical science meets visual art /  Disruption versus dazzle / Chicanery and conspicuousness /  Under the big top at Sims' circus

SALE book bundle / free shipping

Noel Martin, Ralston Crawford as WWII Camoufleurs

Noel Martin exhibition poster

Canadian-born American artist Ralston Crawford (1906-1978) is usually said to have been a Precisionist, with the result that his paintings (and photographs) are typically grouped with those of Joseph Stella, Charles Demuth and Charles Sheeler. Until recently, I hadn’t realized that, early in his career, Crawford worked as an illustrator at the Walt Disney Studio. Later, in the 1930s to early 1940s, he taught at the Art Academy of Cincinnati.

In 1942, at age 36, Crawford received a World War II draft notice. As an experienced photographer, he asked to be assigned to photography for the US Navy. But when he failed to meet the Navy’s requirements, he applied for the camouflage division of the US Engineers Corps. He despised basic training, so much so that he later said that “the enemy was not Hitler, or Mussolini” but what he described as those “those miserable, stupid and sometimes vicious people” who trained recruits “in modern assasination techniques.” As a result, he asked to be assigned to the Weather Division of the Visual Presentation Unit (producing training materials, such as instructional drawings, models, and filmstrips).

While teaching in Cincinnati, one of Crawford students had been a young man named Noel Martin (1922-2009). From 1942-45, Martin served in the US Army as a specialist in camouflage and information. After the war, Martin was asked to design various information brochures for the Cincinnati Art Museum. He learned about the printing process from a craftsman at the museum, and then gradually taught himself the rudiments of graphic design, a profession not then taught in art schools because (in Martin’s words) of “art school snobbery.” Other prominent graphic designers and illustrators who were associated with the Art Academy of Cincinnati at about the same time were Malcolm Grear and Charley Harper.

Beginning in 1986, I taught illustration and graphic design at the Art Academy of Cincinnati until 1990. Noel Martin had more or less retired as the museum's designer, but he was still in the area. 

By that time, I had published a number of articles and one book on art and camouflage. When I learned that Martin had been a WWII camoufleur, I arranged to meet with him for lunch. We talked about his camouflage service, and I jotted down some cryptic notes. I no longer know their whereabouts (although I have them somewhere), but one thing that I do recall is that he mentioned several others whom he knew who had also served as camoufleurs. Of those I clearly remember, one was Victor Christ-Janer (1915-2008). 

•••

RELATED LINKS    

Dazzle Camouflage: What is it and how did it work? /  Nature, Art, and Camouflage / Art, Women's Rights, and Camouflage /  Embedded Figures, Art, and Camouflage / Art, Gestalt, and Camouflage /  Optical science meets visual art /  Disruption versus dazzle / Chicanery and conspicuousness /  Under the big top at Sims' circus

William Twigg Smith / New Zealand-born Camoufleur

In earlier blog posts we’ve talked about a New Zealand-born artist, named William Twigg-Smith (1882-1950) who was one of the first members of the American Camouflage Corps during World War I. Through online searches of vintage newspapers, it’s not difficult to find quite a few articles about him. Among the most thorough is a lengthy full page article by Mike Jay titled Twigg Smith Camoufleur: Camouflage Saved France from the Huns, which was published on page 1 of the Magazine Section of the Honolulu Star-Bulletin (July 12, 1919). An image of the article (not readable obviously) is reproduced above, and the article’s full text is as follows—

•••

Art for art's sake and camouflage for land's sake!

Camouflage saved the land of France, held the ground time and time again in the big German advances. Without it the gun positions would have been more readily detected by the enemy and progress of the Huns would have been more rapid and swift and perhaps might have fully succeeded. By the time the United States entered the war, France and the French troops knew full well the great life and land value of camouflage.

But to the American officers making their first appearance on the firing line "over there"—well!

"Suffering cats and blue blazes! We're here to fight, not hide! Whadda we want with that old stuff?"

That's the way they talked at the beginning. Then came the first mild shower of shells from an unknown and unseen source miles away and brought them around in double quick time with a request for all that "old stuff" such as wire, nets, burlap, screens, twigs and other material that goes to make up camouflage.

Later on, when these selfsame officers had endured it hot and heavy, their tendency was to swing too far into the other direction and to burrow into the ground for concealment of their guns with the camouflage section of the Fortieth Engineers, AEF.

Though born In Nelson, New Zealand, Smith was to all intents and purposes an American long before he secured his naturalization papers while in France on service for Uncle Sam. He was a student at art schools in San Francisco, Chicago and New York and had visited Honolulu eight or nine times before his start for France in 1917.

He landed on French soil on January 7, 1918, and was sent almost directly to the front. He remained at the front until within three days of the signing of the armistice, when he was ordered to an officers' training camp.

"Talk about trouble, I guess we had ours, all right," he remarks on the subject of camouflage for the American guns In France.

"After experimenting for many weary months with color schemes, different systems of coverings, various styles of screens and other stuff, the American camoufleurs finally decided upon a plan that worked to perfection. Not only could the gun position be hidden from ground observers but so well was the plan worked out that it was absolutely impossible to detect such a position even by photographs from the air.

"The French system of camouflage was on the burrow style with a little opening forward for the gun. The top was screened and carried twigs and other material to give it the appearance of the ground.

"That was fine so long as there was no aerial observation. But a photograph taken from an airplane immediately detected the shadows cast by the hump of the mound and the first thing that happened was a shell In the vicinity from a Hun gun."

After trying some 40 different styles, the American camouflage section decided upon a wire screening with strips of burlap hanging down. There were large open places in the top of this netting which made some of the officers think that it was not effective. But it certainly was. These strips cast a series of mottled shadows that photographed exactly like ground would under a tree and gave it such a natural appearance that it was impossible of detection. That was camouflage carried to the highest degree.

"The color scheme entered into this as well. The French had worked that out nicely. We practically used their systems of mottled colors for varied conditions. But the system of shadow casting was entirely our own.

"There was considerable difference in the systems of keeping up the camouflage work also. The English maintained 'dumps' all along their sectors and issued a catalogue of the various kinds of camouflage in store. When request for a certain kind was made a pamphlet of printed directions was sent up with the material of any point on the front. It was then up to the gunners themselves to put the camouflage in place.

"The French also maintained 'dumps' and their camouflage section would give word-of-mouth advice together with a lot of artistic terms as to the manner of placing it. They were strong on watching the color schemes. The artillerymen had to put up their own camouflage, however.

"The Americans on the other hand aimed to have men aways on the front. These men would issue from the 'dumps' and wherever possible herd a gang of trained workers with each division to attend to supervision of concealing a battery. Inspections were made daily to see that discipline was carried out. The camouflage section always had the last word In the matter. If it was negative to movements on dangerous grounds its word was followed. It it was agreeable then the rest of the authorities could thresh it out.

"The older officers, especially those who had served with the British and French troops before coming into the United States army, recognized the worth of camouflage without question and strictIy enforced the orders of the deception division. Just to give an idea, here's a case in point.

"In a position near Bois Chanot, in the vicinity of Beaumont, there was a light fall of snow one morning. The camouflage section immediately requested no movements in order to keep from making tracks to battery position. Orders were issued by the commanding officer of the battery to shoot anyone attempting to get off the paths wired out by the camouflage section.

"General Summeral of the 1st Division was a great crank on camouflage. He learned by bitter experience. He thought it 'all bunk' at first, but later issued orders that no camouflage be attempted without advice and direction of the camouflage section.

"One of the favorite tricks at the front was to use a position a great deal for a few nights and then move out, at the same time keeping up appearances of activity. A fire at times to make a lot of smoke. This would draw the fire and detract the enemy attention from a new position a few hundred yards to the right or left of the old.

"On the other hand some of the artillery officers seemed to think that anything sent out by the camouflage section was endowed with magic powers of concealment. Without any reference as to its fitness in the natural scheme they would drape the material over the ammunition guns in such a manner that if anything it made the position more conspicuous. And they would be well satisfied with the job until a camouflage section man came along to rave and tear his hair and straighten the thing out.

"The camouflage section was composed of artists, sculptors, house painters, marble workers, tile layers, bricklayers, builders, carpenters and if I remember right we even had a former parson one section. They were all trained at the school conducted back of the lines before, they went to the front to work. Some of them proved grand little camoufleurs, too.
"One stunt that was started by our section and taken up with avidity was that of laying temporary camouflage for guns on the march when making a short halt. The first thing gunners were ordered to do at a halt was to cut branches and arrange them over the field pieces. This saved many a gun from a sad fate. The gunners could always find room beneath the canopy of branches in times of stress."

Twigg Smith brought back with him from France a big collection of photographs of camouflage work, some of which are published today for the first time. These are unique pictures in that they show actual work done by the camoufleurs to protect guns, screen roads and conceal movement of either guns or troops.

•••

RELATED LINKS    

Dazzle Camouflage: What is it and how did it work? /  Nature, Art, and Camouflage / Art, Women's Rights, and Camouflage /  Embedded Figures, Art, and Camouflage / Art, Gestalt, and Camouflage /  Optical science meets visual art /  Disruption versus dazzle / Chicanery and conspicuousness /  Under the big top at Sims' circus